Sex Trafficking Charges in Maryland

Maryland has strengthened its laws regarding sex trafficking, reflecting a commitment to combating this serious crime. The state defines sex trafficking under Maryland law as the exploitation of individuals through coercion, fraud, or force for commercial sex acts.

Key Aspects of Maryland’s Sex Trafficking Laws

1. Definitions
– Sex Trafficking: Involves recruiting, enticing, harboring, or transporting a person for the purpose of engaging in commercial sexual activity.
– Involuntary Servitude: Includes scenarios where individuals are forced or coerced into performing sexual acts against their will.

2. Penalties:
– Sex trafficking is classified as a felony, carrying severe penalties, including lengthy prison sentences and substantial fines.
– Enhanced penalties may apply if minors are involved or if the offense involves multiple victims.

A person who violates Md. Code Ann., Crim. Law § 3-1102(b) for sex trafficking a minor or sex trafficking through force, threat, coercion, or fraud, commits a felony, subject to imprisonment not exceeding 25 years, a fine not exceeding USD 15,000, or both.

3. Victim Protections:
– Maryland laws emphasize the protection of victims, providing resources and support services for those who have been trafficked.

4. Law Enforcement Training:
– Ongoing training for law enforcement to identify and respond effectively to sex trafficking cases, ensuring that victims receive the necessary support.

Common Defenses Against Sex Trafficking Charges

1. Lack of Knowledge:
– Arguing that the defendant was unaware of the trafficking activities or did not know that the individuals involved were being exploited.

2. Consent:
– In some cases, the defense may argue that the individuals involved consented to the activities, although this is complex given the nature of trafficking.

3. False Allegations:
– Claiming that the charges are based on false accusations, which can occur in cases of personal vendettas or misunderstandings.

4. Entrapment:
– If law enforcement induced the defendant to commit the crime, a defense of entrapment may be applicable, arguing that the defendant would not have engaged in the activity without coercion from authorities.

5. Insufficient Evidence:
– Challenging the prosecution’s evidence, including lack of credible witnesses, physical evidence, or documentation to support trafficking claims.

6. Coercion or Duress:
– Demonstrating that the defendant was coerced or threatened into participating in trafficking activities, thus affecting their culpability.

Facing sex trafficking charges in Maryland is a serious matter with significant legal consequences. Understanding the laws and potential defenses is crucial for anyone involved in such a case. Consulting with an experienced attorney is essential to navigate these complex legal challenges and protect one’s rights.

Contact Caroline Norman Frost for a free consultation.