The Law Office Of Caroline Norman Frost | Maryland Criminal Defense Attorney
Caroline Frost
Rated by Super Lawyers


loading ...
Nation's Premier NACDA Top Ten Ranking 2023
The Law Office Of Caroline Norman Frost | Maryland Criminal Defense Attorney

Call

Maryland’s Most Zealous Criminal and DUI Defense Attorney

Media Influence on Criminal Cases

On Behalf of | Dec 16, 2024 | Firm News

Freddie Gray Case (Baltimore, Maryland)

 

Charges:

Six Baltimore police officers were charged in connection with Freddie Gray’s death. Charges included:

  • Second-Degree Depraved Heart Murder (Md. Code, Criminal Law, § 2-204).
  • Involuntary Manslaughter (Md. Code, Criminal Law, § 2-207).
  • Second-Degree Assault (Md. Code, Criminal Law, § 3-203).
  • Misconduct in Office (common law offense in Maryland).
  • False Imprisonment (common law offense in Maryland).

 

Outcome:

Media coverage played a role in highlighting issues of systemic misconduct. However, the prosecution’s case was criticized for lacking strong evidence. Three officers were acquitted, and charges against the remaining three were dropped.

 

  1. Central Park Five (New York City)

 

Charges:

The five young men were initially charged with crimes including:

  • Rape (New York Penal Law § 130.35).
  • Assault (New York Penal Law § 120.10).
  • Robbery (New York Penal Law § 160.10).

 

Outcome:

Despite coerced confessions and intense media pressure portraying them as guilty, DNA evidence later exonerated the defendants. Media attention after the fact, driven by investigative reporting and public advocacy, helped overturn their convictions.

 

  1. Adnan Syed Case (Baltimore, Maryland)

 

Charges:

Adnan Syed was charged with:

  • First-Degree Murder (Md. Code, Criminal Law, § 2-201).
  • Kidnapping (Md. Code, Criminal Law, § 3-502).
  • False Imprisonment (common law offense in Maryland).

 

Outcome:

Syed was convicted in 2000, but media attention, particularly through the podcast Serial, brought scrutiny to the evidence and trial proceedings. In 2022, his conviction was vacated due to issues with evidence disclosure, and his case remains under review.

 

Cases That Did Not End Well for the Defendant

 

  1. George Huguely V Case (Maryland and Virginia)

 

Charges:

Huguely was charged with:

  • Second-Degree Murder (Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-32).
  • Grand Larceny for taking Yeardley Love’s computer (Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-95).

 

Outcome:

The media’s portrayal of Huguely as a violent individual added pressure to the trial proceedings. He was convicted of second-degree murder and sentenced to 23 years in prison.

 

  1. Casey Anthony Case (Florida)

 

Charges:

Casey Anthony was charged with:

  • First-Degree Murder (Florida Statutes § 782.04).
  • Aggravated Child Abuse (Florida Statutes § 827.03).
  • Aggravated Manslaughter of a Child (Florida Statutes § 782.07).
  • Four Counts of Providing False Information to Law Enforcement (Florida Statutes § 837.055).

 

Outcome:

Despite the media painting Anthony as guilty, she was acquitted of the murder charges due to insufficient evidence. However, the public presumption of guilt led to significant reputational damage.

 

  1. Lori Drew Cyberbullying Case (Missouri)

 

Charges:

Drew was charged federally under:

  • Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) (18 U.S.C. § 1030), alleging that she violated MySpace’s terms of service to harass the victim.

 

Outcome:

Drew was acquitted of felony charges but convicted of a misdemeanor. The intense media scrutiny vilified her, leading to widespread public outrage and personal hardship.

 

How We Can Help Defendants Facing Media Scrutiny

 

At The Law Office of Caroline Norman Frost, we specialize in defending clients in high-profile cases where media involvement can influence public perception and judicial outcomes.

 

Our Strategies Include:

 

  1. Media Management:
  • Collaborating with media professionals to shape accurate narratives and counter negative press.
  1. Legal Protections:
  • Filing motions for a change of venue, jury sequestration, or gag orders to ensure a fair trial.
  1. Focus on Evidence:
  • Ensuring that the facts of the case, not media portrayals, drive the outcome.
  1. Protecting Your Rights:
  • Advocating for privacy and confidentiality whenever possible.

 

Call-to-Action

 

Media involvement in criminal cases can drastically affect outcomes, both positively and negatively. If you are facing charges and your case is gaining public attention, let The Law Office of Caroline Norman Frost provide the skilled representation you need to protect your rights.

 

Call us today at 240-439-1922 for a confidential consultation. Don’t let media scrutiny derail your case—contact us now.